07.27.06
World War III (or possibly IV)
Check out this article which talks about how the current war on terrorism is considered by some to be the third world war (or possibly fourth if you include the Cold War). The article has a decent amount of substance, and is worth the read. Heres an interesting tidbit:
Even the French leftist philosopher, Jean Baudrillard, adopted the expression to describe the war on terror, although he used it his own unique way: “There is no longer a front, no demarcation line, the enemy sits in the heart of the culture that fights it,” he told the German magazine Der Spiegel. “That is, if you like, the fourth world war: no longer between peoples, states, systems and ideologies, but, rather, of the human species against itself.”
Kalki Gaur said,
July 28, 2006 at 7:26 am
World War three is a war by great powers on smaller powers and wars on oil producing OPEC nations.
India welcomes the Third World War.
Islam is a religion of Sword. Islam was imposed by sword on Egypt, Syria, Libya, Algeria and Persia.
Christians have a moral duty to reclaim Egypt, Syria, Libya, Algeria, Turkey for Christianity as no one ever became Muslim without the threat of sword.
Islamic nuclear weapons is a threat to human race.
Conquest and colonization of all oil-producing Islamic nations is a small price to pay for eradicating the Islamic nuclear menace.
(1) The “World War Three” has started.
“WORLD WAR THREE” has begun. Republican Vice President Dick Cheney declared the restart of the New Cold War in March 2006. Republican Former Speaker of the Congress declared the start of the first phase of the “WORLD WAR THREE” in July 2006.
(2) “World War Three” now promotes the national interests of United States, India and China. Imperial colonial powers of the yester years- France, Germany, Japan, Italy, Ottoman Turkey, Russia, Spain- are in decline now and they wouldnever again be world powers.
(3) The post-1945 decolonization process permanently weakened former colonial powers that also suffer from disastrous population decline due to the declining fertility rates of their women. The Declining populations would rule out any imperial pretensions of Russia, France, Germany, Japan, Spain and Italy.
(4) The 2006 start of the World War Three is in the geopolitical national interest of the United States as presently United States enjoys military preponderance in the world. The 2006 is the ideal time for the start of the World War Three as it would guarantee that the coalition of Allied Powers led by USA, India and Britain is highly likely to win the World War Three. Any delay or postponment of the World War Three would progressively work against the national interests of the United States. Now is the good time for the World War Three.
(5) The 2006 start of the World War Three is in the national interest of India as well as China. Any delay of the World War Three would make Islamic Nuclear Terrorism formidable. The World War Three should begin now, so that the civilized world may successfully De-Nuke Islamic Atom Bomb and Islamic Nuclear Weapons Delivery Systems.
(6) The 2006 start of the World War Three is in the national interest of Russia as it would allow Russian Army regain for Russia the glory it lost after the demise of the Soviet Union in 1991.
(7) The principal goal of the World War Three is to gain control over world’s oil and gas reserves so that OPEC Oil Gas Producers are brought under the civilized occupation and control of the Great Power led Petro-Colonial Empires. The purpose of the World War Three is to partition the OPEC Oil Producing Nations into the spheres of influence of leading Six world powers, namely, USA, India, China, Russia, Europe and Japan.
Diplomat Kalki Gaur
email: diplomatkalkigaur@yahoo.com
web Blog: http://360.yahoo.com/diplomacyofcivilizations
Blog: http://360.yahoo.com/neoconservativemanifesto
WEBBLOG: http://diplomacyofcivilizations.squarespace.com
Blog http://www.clearblogs.com/neoconservativeparty
http://360.yahoo.com/theworldwar3
http://diplomacyofcivilizations.blogspot.com
http://empirepaxamericana.blogspot.com
site admin said,
July 29, 2006 at 8:59 pm
Wow. Thats one long comment. I think its a bit of a copy/paste from one of the many blogs listed above. I did find another pretty interesting article It’s all about the oil. Here are some tidbits, but you gotta read it for yourself..
elisa said,
July 30, 2006 at 4:36 am
you know what – that is a long comment!
But I definately have some qualms with this person’s point of view and the links he offered.
I remember the words of the Buddha in Pairs 3-6 of the Dhammpada
“He abused me, he beat me, he defeated me, he robbed me,” in those who harbour such thoughts hatred is not appeased.
“He abused me, he beat me, he defeated me, he robbed me,” in those who do not harbour such thoughts hatred is appeased.
Hate is not overcome by hate; by Love (Metta) alone is hate appeased. This is an eternal law.
The others know not that in this quarrel we perish; those of them who realise it, have their quarrels calmed thereby.
So if this guy is so upset with how Islam “imposed by sword on Egypt, Syria, Libya, Algeria and Persia” as he claims, then why would he ever suggest that “Christians have a moral duty to reclaim Egypt, Syria, Libya, Algeria, Turkey” and so there must be a war……..
one wrong doesn’t fix another. As the poet Janine Pommy Vega said This eye for an eye is not working out, everyone is going to go blind.